Children are the symbol of peace and justice kissing. When property’s truth can be the nature of value, revolt. MK Gandhi in Canning Hall, England.


Liberalism and Fascist Propaganda. Beyond revolt and law.

Fascist Propaganda.  

                                                                               American Revolution.                              bernayspropagandaBoston_Massacre_high-res

Why intention is all one needs to further human freedom during our biggest disgraces. Satyagraha denied.

Catechism of the Catholic Church




1749 Freedom makes man a moral subject. When he acts deliberately, man is, so to speak, the father of his acts. Human acts, that is, acts that are freely chosen in consequence of a judgment of conscience, can be morally evaluated. They are either good or evil.


1750 The morality of human acts depends on: – the object chosen, the end in view or the intention, the circumstances of the action.

The object, the intention, and the circumstances make up the “sources,” or constitutive elements, of the morality of human acts.

1751 The object chosen is a good toward which the will deliberately directs itself. It is the matter of a human act. The object chosen morally specifies the act of the will, insofar as reason recognizes and judges it to be or not to be in conformity with the true good. Objective norms of morality express the rational order of good and evil, attested to by conscience.

1752 In contrast to the object, the intention resides in the acting subject. Because it lies at the voluntary source of an action and determines it by its end intention is an element essential to the moral evaluation of an action. The end is the first goal of the intention and indicates the purpose pursued in the action. The intention is a movement of the will toward the end: it is concerned with the goal of the activity. It aims at the good anticipated from the action undertaken. Intention is not limited to directing individual actions, but can guide several actions toward one and the same purpose; it can orient one’s whole life toward its ultimate end. For example, a service done with the end of helping one’s neighbor can at the same time be inspired by the love of God as the ultimate end of all our actions. One and the same action can also be inspired by several intentions, such as performing a service in order to obtain a favor or to boast about it.

 A good intention (for example, that of helping one’s neighbor) does not make behavior that is intrinsically disordered, such as lying and calumny, good or just. The end does not justify the means. Thus the condemnation of an innocent person cannot be justified as a legitimate means of saving the nation. On the other hand, an added bad intention (such as vainglory) makes an act evil that, in and of itself, can be good such as almsgiving.

An evil action cannot be justified by reference to a good intention” (St. Thomas Aquinas) does not justify the means. A morally good act requires the goodness of its object, of its end, and of its circumstancestogether. There are concrete acts that it is always wrong to choose, because their choice entails a disorder of the will i.e., a moral evil. One may not do evil so that good may result from it.

To believe in something and not to live it is dishonest.  Satyagraha.

To believe in something and not to live it is dishonest.  Satyagraha again.