Recently an email has gone out to the world claiming that Muslims want to impose Sharia law on America. Politifacts.com points to the Oxford Dictionary of Islam to say in no uncertain terms that the dictionary does not contain the word “Dhimmitude,” but it does include the word “dhimmi.” The Dictionary says that dhimmi is a historical term used to describe a “non-Muslim under protection of Muslim law,” which could include Jews, Christians or Hindus. Adult male dhimmis were required to pay taxes and follow regulations on dress, occupation and residence. In return, dhimmis received “security of life and property, defense against enemies, communal self-government, and freedom of religion practice.” The dictionary notes that dhimmi status has lost relevance in the present day because of the rise of nation-states and modern legal codes. This has been done by practitioners who in their zeal to apply the Constitution are preoccupied. We (the not people) are derivatives of terror and therefore adherents to Islamic Sharia law, for now. An interpretation that presupposes bestiality. For the past few days much has been made of the US Constitution. They reveal sad facts. Majestically dressed in the robes of Islamophobia, immigrant slander, libel and every sort of hate, the rule of law has been used against the people of these United States. Modernity has revealed raw facts. Legal codes are relevant to Sharia law of the dhimmis, which is nothing more than a fraudulent contract between we the not people and the United States.
Test of Natural Liberty and the Limits of Democracy